#FINAL CUT PRO X VS FINAL CUT PRO SOFTWARE#
#FINAL CUT PRO X VS FINAL CUT PRO PC#
#FINAL CUT PRO X VS FINAL CUT PRO PROFESSIONAL#
#FINAL CUT PRO X VS FINAL CUT PRO MAC#
#FINAL CUT PRO X VS FINAL CUT PRO WINDOWS#

That's a has really given the best answer here, but is correct that there should be a 30-day demo of FCPX to try. Of course the answer is 'HITFILM IS THE BEST AND FCPX IS EVIL!'

#FINAL CUT PRO X VS FINAL CUT PRO PROFESSIONAL#

If you're doing professional video work, then Final Cut will probably look better on a resume, but if you're just working for yourself (professionally or not) it doesn't matter what you use as long as you can get the job done, which both programs are capable of - depending mostly on your VFX needs. Final Cut might be a bit of a learning curve, though a lot of the skills are at least somewhat translatable.

If you're already familiar with HitFilm Express, you'll be able to jump right in with Pro. In other words, HitFilm is a very powerful VFX machine, with a decent but basic Editor attached.įinal Cut is an amazing Editor, with a bit of VFX capability. If you have a good mix of both, then I'd lean more towards HitFilm. If VFX and COMPOSITING are your top priority, then HitFilm is what you want. FCP is in a precarious position and we're all waiting to see whether it can bounce back from the FCX debacle.This is EXTREMELY generalized, but if you care more about EDITING and your setup is compatible with it, then Final Cut might be the best choice.Premiere has the advantage of association with After Effects and Photoshop.Now Premiere is considered more professional. FCP was more the 'professional's choice' than Premiere, until Final Cut X in 2011.

#FINAL CUT PRO X VS FINAL CUT PRO MAC#

It's unlikely to be worth buying an Apple computer just for the editing, but if you already own a Mac then it's a viable option. On the other hand, if you're a hobbyist and don't need the professional features, FCX is still worth a look. In the past it would have been a brave editor who favored Adobe over Apple, but since Final Cut X many have come out publicly in support of Premiere Pro. Moreover, Apple has shown little regard for the professional community in recent years, the Mac Pro looks to be in trouble, and there is much speculation that Apple is abandoning the professional market in favor of its consumer products. If you're a serious video professional, Final Cut X is unlikely to meet your needs as it lost many critical features required by pros. Since Final Cut X the decision has become somewhat easier.

#FINAL CUT PRO X VS FINAL CUT PRO PC#

This is especially true if you already owned a PC capable of running Premiere but would have to buy new hardware for FCP. However there hasn't been much to split them for many years, and for a long time you've been able to get essentially the same functionality from Adobe for less money. So as a general rule, don't base your decision on a feature of one product unless you are sure it isn't going to be introduced or upgraded by the other product in the near future.īefore Final Cut X I would have said that if you want the best and money is no object, FCP was probably the way to go.

It's also worth noting that when one application had a feature the other lacked, the gap was often closed in the next round of releases. Other than that, the practical differences between Premiere and FPC were relatively minor up until the release of Final Cut X in 2011.

#FINAL CUT PRO X VS FINAL CUT PRO SOFTWARE#

When purchased as part of a software bundle, Adobe products form a seamless package that operates almost like a single application. Both these products are very highly regarded, industry standard software. One fact in Premiere's favor that is that it integrates very well with After Effects (video compositing) and Photoshop (for graphics). The bundles are highly recommended in both cases, giving you much more power and flexibility over things like audio, graphics, etc.

#FINAL CUT PRO X VS FINAL CUT PRO WINDOWS#

In my experience Premiere has been very stable on Windows systems since at least Windows XP.īoth Premiere and FCP are standalone video editing applications, and both are available as part of larger software bundles. It is often said that FCP is more stable and/or faster than Premiere, but this may have been more a reflection on the operating system than the software, dating back to the days when Windows was noticeably less stable than Mac. From version CS5 Premiere Pro was again available for the Macintosh. For a number of years Premiere was only available on the PC and FCP only available on the Mac. Traditionally FCP has been more popular amongst professional editors, although this can also be attributed to the popularity of Mac vs Windows in the same market. The top spots in mid-level video editing are (arguably) held by Apple and Adobe, and many people are looking for a specific comparison between Premiere Pro and Final Cut Pro (FCP). Adobe Premiere Pro vs Apple Final Cut Pro

Final cut pro x vs final cut pro